Oklahoma man has to pay child support despite not being the father

An Oklahoma man has been ordered to pay child support despite a DNA test showing conclusively that he is NOT father.

The following story is from Newson6.com.

NewsOn6.com – Tulsa, OK – News, Weather, Video and Sports – KOTV.com |

TULSA, Oklahoma –

An Oklahoma man is hoping to change the law after he was ordered to pay child support for a baby that’s not his.

Thomas said he wants to change the Oklahoma law in hopes of helping other men in the same situation.

When Thomas’ high school girlfriend got pregnant, he married her. Five months later she had a little boy and he believed he had a son, but, as happens to a lot of young marriages, theirs fell apart.

The boy was three when Thomas decided to take a paternity test.

“It comes back zero percent. I was in my office and I saw that. I should’ve expected it but I didn’t and it hit me. I’m telling my co-worker how shocked I am that someone could do this to someone,” he said.

A judge ordered Thomas to take another DNA test. He did and got the same result.

At first, the judge ruled Thomas was off the hook financially, but then reversed that decision because Oklahoma law says men must question paternity within two years of the child’s birth.

Thomas said he had no reason to question it before he did, but, because he missed the deadline, the judge ordered him to pay around $500 a month in child support, plus, nearly $15,000 in back support plus interest – all for a child that is not his.

“I wish I was telling a lie,” he said. “I wish it wasn’t the truth but it is. That’s what makes it so crazy. Everyone I talk to about this can’t believe where the court system is coming from.”

Thomas wants lawmakers to change the law. He believes DNA matters regardless of when a man learns he’s not the father of a child, especially if the man was lied to, but it will be too late for him.

Read more:

http://www.newson6.com/story/34240493/ok-man-ordered-to-pay-child-support-despite-not-being-father

That is outrageous and just another example of how the family court system is biased against fathers.   This story shows the importance of always having a DNA test by a reputable laboratory whose genetic tests are generally acknowledged as reliable by accreditation bodies designated by the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services.

Two accredited Testing Facilities in California:

GeneTrack Biolabs Inc-Locations throughout California with chain of custody declarations.  Toll Free 1-877-714-6356

http://www.genetrackus.com/

DNA Diagnostics Center- Locations throughout California with chain of custody declarations.

1-800-613-5768

http://www.dnacenter.com/locations/california.html

Over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation for sale.

To view more information on over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation visit: https://legaldocspro.myshopify.com/products

The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. He believes in Father’s Rights as he has seen first hand the incredible bias against fathers in the family law courts in California. He is currently working on creating a product that will assist fathers to represent themselves in Court regarding custody and support issues.

Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit http://freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/  for more information.

Follow Fathers Rights on Twitter at:

https://twitter.com/Fathersrights16

Follow Fathers Rights on Google Plus at:

https://plus.google.com/+Fathersrights

DISCLAIMER:

Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.

The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

 

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s